*if you've read any of my thoughts regarding the current and future state of our lineups, you needn't read...it's repetitive*
quad hit the nail on the head.
dec. 18th.
hardly photoshopped (although i wish it was, sans business names).
5-7? nah. look at the chick walking down the street and the size of the vehicles. sure, the telephoto lens helps with the compressing, but it was solid double overhead. easy.
if a person could have made it out to the peak and stayed in position they'd have deserved a merit badge. if a person then could have first chosen this wave out of the overwhelming amount of closeouts, made the drop and come out of the barrel, well, then they'd be as lucky as those seven pricks in new york. furthermore, if a person drives up here in search of "that" wave they'll be extremely disappointed.
certainly my goal isn't to "blow this place up". nor do i think my images will play a role in blowing this place up. sure, that even sounds ignorant to me. but when you think about it, there's a reason that the majority of our breaks are
fairly uncrowded:
1) it's cold - wetsuit technology continues to evolve, sure, but most surfers of any threat to the locals that dominate our peaks aren't going to spend the time, energy and money to come here and 9 out of 10 times score blown out beach break. i've heard of a few pros rolling through on their way up to the CWC in Canada the past few years, but they're here and they're gone lickity split. in other words, i don't think that overcrowding is an imminent problem.
2) it's sharky - that's just a fact.
3) it's fickle - ditto
4) as previously stated, the coast of the pnw isn't exactly thriving with career opportunity. i would guess that the majority of surfers in the world - kids, teens, seniors excluded - do indeed have jobs. jobs near breaks much better than ours. jobs in coastal cities much less cold, rainy and windy than ours. jobs that probably pay better than ours (depending, of course), etc., etc.,
i mean, the population of SS has grown by 1,000 in 40 years. that's 250 people every 10 years, or, 25 people a year. i wonder how many of those 25 each year surf? probably not a lot. but maybe some. or maybe they'll learn. and that's just the actual sport of surfing's fault. why do we do it? because it's fun. it's no surprise that other people like it too. although it does suck and i wish that nobody would ever start surfing again, but that's incredibly selfish, outlandish and impractical.
last year the surfrider foundation surveyed 4,000 oregonians to found out which activities they participated in while at the beach (
http://oregon.surfrider.org/blog/2011/0 ... use-study/). beach going took the cake with close to 65% and surfing finished last with less than 5% of the total vote, or, 200 people. when i think that blacks or malibu or rincon sees near that amount of people per day (on a good day), it puts things into perspective of how uncrowded it is up here. sure there are people surfing at shorties every single weekend, but not nearly as many just north or south of there. there is
a lot of room up here still. especially at the beachies.
anyway, late and hazy and rambling again...
lots of mixed emotions right now. lots of hate. lots of praise. when genuinely good people are mad at you, you can't really feel good about yourself. it sucks.
on the other hand this is my chosen path and i knew that it would come with the territory.
stuck between a rock and a hard place. go figure.
looking back and looking forward, i'd rather just travel and shoot surfers for stories and what not and leave shots of the pnw to simply grace my walls.
hopefully that's how it all works out.
like with most things, only time will tell.
60% of the time, it works every time.