O.J. Simpson, double murderer.

[gills]

The OJ Simpson trial was fair and balanced, just like Fox--


Besides, OJ showed a big problem with our legal system-- A man goes on trial and must answer to a jury of his peers. The problem with a 'jury of your peers' is that they couldn't find 12 people who got away with brutally killing two people.

[nm]

The problem with a 'jury of your peers' is that they couldn't find 12 people who got away with brutally killing two people.

That.........and a 'jury of your peers' knows the secret to getting out of jury duty.

[qball]

The police planted evidence.

OJ killed Nicole.

The jury could not recognize that the two are not mutually exclusive.

[Nomad]

"If the glove don't fit, you MUST ACQUIT!"
Johnny Cochran

[Spider]

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/21/us/21 ... r=homepage

[qball]

slim ray of hope for humanity. Fox has decided that the Simpson story is too slimey ever for them; the book and tv interview have been canceled.

[SoCalBarger]

slim ray of hope for humanity. Fox has decided that the Simpson story is too slimey ever for them; the book and tv interview have been canceled.

I wish I could share your optimism, IMO the entire thing was a Fox stunt to gain integrity they've never had. I don't think they ever planned on actually airing it. Rupert Murdoch is the biggest hypocrite piece of shat. Where exactly in the doctrine of family values is it ok to put an accused double-murderer (that many consider guilty) on nation-wide TV to describe how he "would have killed them". I'm not suprised, what more could be expected from the family values crowd?

[Ding Delamerton]

$3.5 million.

i would kill any or all of you for that. i might even take up smoking after.